Thursday, October 05, 2006

"August terror plot is a 'fiction' underscoring police failures"

The Raw Story:
"Lieutenant-Colonel (ret.) Nigel Wylde, a former senior British Army Intelligence Officer, has suggested that the police and government story about the "terror plot" revealed on 10th August was part of a "pattern of lies and deceit."
[ . . . ]

But Lt. Col. Wylde, who was awarded the Queen's Gallantry Medal for his command of the Belfast Explosive Ordnance Disposal Unit in 1974, described this scenario as a "fiction." Creating liquid explosives is a "highly dangerous and sophisticated task," he states, one that requires not only significant chemical expertise but also appropriate equipment.

Terror plot scenario "untenable"

"The idea that these people could sit in the plane toilet and simply mix together these normal household fluids to create a high explosive capable of blowing up the entire aircraft is untenable," said Lt. Col. Wylde, who was trained as an ammunition technical officer responsible for terrorist bomb disposal at the Royal Army Ordnance Corps in Sandhurst.

After working as a bomb defuser in Northern Ireland, Lt. Col. Wylde became a senior officer in British Army Intelligence in 1977. During the Cold War, he collected intelligence as part of an undercover East German "liaison unit," then went on to work in the Ministry of Defense to review its communications systems.

"So who came up with the idea that a bomb could be made on board? Not Al Qaeda for sure. It would not work. Bin Laden is interested in success not deterrence by failure," Wylde stated.

"This story has been blown out of all proportion. The liquids would need to be carefully distilled at freezing temperatures to extract the required chemicals, which are very difficult to obtain in the purities needed."

Once the fluids have been extracted, the process of mixing them produces significant amounts of heat and vile fumes. "The resulting liquid then needs some hours at room temperature for the white crystals that are the explosive to develop." The whole process, which can take between 12 and 36 hours, is "very dangerous, even in a lab, and can lead to premature detonation," said Lt. Col. Wylde.

If there was a conspiracy, he added, "it did not involve manufacturing the explosives in the loo," as this simply "could not have worked." The process would be quickly and easily detected. The fumes of the chemicals in the toilet "would be smelt by anybody in the area." They would also inevitably "cause the alarms in the toilet and in the air change system in the aircraft to be triggered. The pilot has the ability to dump all the air from an aircraft as a fire-fighting measure, leaving people to use oxygen masks. All this means the planned attack would be detected long before the queues outside the loo had grown to enormous lengths."
[ . . . ]
'I've been closely monitoring the internet communications of extremist Muslim groups inside the UK both before and after 7/7, and they are intimately interconnected,' said Jenvey, who is affiliated with the London-based terror watch group VIGIL. 'We've identified a coordinated leadership of at least 20 and up to 60 people, extremist preachers with blatant international al-Qaeda terrorist connections.'

Jenvey noted that even though they are known to the authorities and are monitored while breaking the law with impunity, particularly in their private sermons, the police have failed to take appropriate action against them. 'The police don't need to round up and detain thousands of British Muslims. If they only arrested, charged and prosecuted these 20 key terrorist leaders, they will have a struck a fatal blow against the epicentres of al-Qaeda extremism in the UK. But they're sitting on this.'"
[ . . . ]
The official reluctance to act against Bakri and his active associates in the UK does not match the government's willingness to act pre-emptively to foil a plot of doubtful reality. Official reluctance to acknowledge the significance of the detonators used in the 7/7 terrorist operation suggests that the threat is far more sophisticated than authorities have admitted, and that emphasis on home-grown amateurs is mistaken. Lt. Col. Wylde's observations would seem to indicate that the terror-threat narrative is being manipulated for reasons of political expediency.

3 Comments:

Blogger Meatball One said...

You r a terror lovin' faggot. Ya hear me?

Saturday, October 7, 2006 at 7:03:00 PM PDT  
Blogger steve said...

If you don't love terror, you are with the terrorists!

Wait, that doesn't sound right...

As my friend Bonnie says, at weed-garden.blogspot.com:


"Besides, don't the terrorists hate us for our freedoms? Now they won't hate us so much. Hey, we could completely eliminate the terrorist threat. Let's start with that pesky Bill of Rights. And why bother with voting? Nobody believes it has any effect anyway, now that big-money controls political campaigns and Republicans control the voting process.

"But maybe the terrorists haven't noticed these abridgements of our freedom. Everybody, spread the word! Tell your neighbors how our freedoms are being taken away. Be sure to talk to the Palestinian grocer down the street, so he can pass the information on to his terrorist friends.

"Eventually, terrorists will be sending money to the United States, to help us spread the lack of freedom to other countries. Think of the boost to our economy!"

Sunday, October 8, 2006 at 11:58:00 AM PDT  
Blogger steve said...

By the way, just trying to load your blog crashed my browser repeatedly last night.

Sunday, October 8, 2006 at 12:07:00 PM PDT  

Post a Comment

<< Home

Web Site Counters
Staples Coupons